Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Suppressors
Suppressor that don’t break ya
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="QuietTexan" data-source="post: 2383953" data-attributes="member: 116181"><p>Oh I read them all. Including the 22LR and 300 BLK sub reviews. 57 in total on the main page (there's a glitch in the Surefire links, you go to the same review twice and can't see the 24.8 overall score review). I'll admit I wished they tested the default brake on the Omega 300 for a direct comparison to the (outdated, like the Ultra 9) Harvester 300 instead of replacing with a flat cap. The brake is obviously ineffective as a brake but apparently has provable negatives to the shooter, which should be included in the review because they modified the Omega 300 from the factory configuration.</p><p></p><p>I'm saying that Pew's entire concept of "overall composite suppression rating" that they put on their rankings page is utter BS because it doesn't consider the most salient points of shooting - which can be boiled down to "hitting things hard enough to hurt them". Splitting hairs over the first jet peak and how many microseconds long it is is very interesting, but ultimately has zero bearing on anything considering they're admittedly ignoring any factors other than sound. And that's a conclusion drawn from their own reviews, because despite their own Point #4 being "accuracy influence on the host weapon" and the word "accuracy" itself only appears in the reviews for the CSG Hyperion, TBAC Ultra 9, Energetic Arms VOX S, and the SIG SRD762 Ti-QD.</p><p></p><p>Pew is not turning out to be a great appeal to authority.</p><p></p><p>The Ultra 9 was tested on the same rifle and still scored better than the DA Nomad -Ti and DA Nomad-30, so not really sure what your point is there? Seems like the TBAC legacy is still beating those two.</p><p></p><p>If you like yours, great. Nothing wrong with that. Just a weird flex to try to cut down Banish and TBAC using oddly specific, outdated data.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="QuietTexan, post: 2383953, member: 116181"] Oh I read them all. Including the 22LR and 300 BLK sub reviews. 57 in total on the main page (there's a glitch in the Surefire links, you go to the same review twice and can't see the 24.8 overall score review). I'll admit I wished they tested the default brake on the Omega 300 for a direct comparison to the (outdated, like the Ultra 9) Harvester 300 instead of replacing with a flat cap. The brake is obviously ineffective as a brake but apparently has provable negatives to the shooter, which should be included in the review because they modified the Omega 300 from the factory configuration. I'm saying that Pew's entire concept of "overall composite suppression rating" that they put on their rankings page is utter BS because it doesn't consider the most salient points of shooting - which can be boiled down to "hitting things hard enough to hurt them". Splitting hairs over the first jet peak and how many microseconds long it is is very interesting, but ultimately has zero bearing on anything considering they're admittedly ignoring any factors other than sound. And that's a conclusion drawn from their own reviews, because despite their own Point #4 being "accuracy influence on the host weapon" and the word "accuracy" itself only appears in the reviews for the CSG Hyperion, TBAC Ultra 9, Energetic Arms VOX S, and the SIG SRD762 Ti-QD. Pew is not turning out to be a great appeal to authority. The Ultra 9 was tested on the same rifle and still scored better than the DA Nomad -Ti and DA Nomad-30, so not really sure what your point is there? Seems like the TBAC legacy is still beating those two. If you like yours, great. Nothing wrong with that. Just a weird flex to try to cut down Banish and TBAC using oddly specific, outdated data. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Suppressors
Suppressor that don’t break ya
Top