Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
substituting H4831SC for H4831
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Greyfox" data-source="post: 1221796" data-attributes="member: 10291"><p>I compared H4831 to H4831sc in my 6.5x284 several years ago. I used 53gr with a Fed210M primer. While H4831 filled the case a bit more(not 100%) it made no difference in accuracy, velocity, or ES. My pet load for my 6.5x284's is Retumbo. It fills the case(Lapua or Norma) without high pressure signs, has the same accuracy, and about 100FPS higher velocity and very low ES . As claimed, the H4831sc did meter more consistently then the H4831 in my RCBS Chargemaster.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Greyfox, post: 1221796, member: 10291"] I compared H4831 to H4831sc in my 6.5x284 several years ago. I used 53gr with a Fed210M primer. While H4831 filled the case a bit more(not 100%) it made no difference in accuracy, velocity, or ES. My pet load for my 6.5x284's is Retumbo. It fills the case(Lapua or Norma) without high pressure signs, has the same accuracy, and about 100FPS higher velocity and very low ES . As claimed, the H4831sc did meter more consistently then the H4831 in my RCBS Chargemaster. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
substituting H4831SC for H4831
Top