Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Standard of Precision
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cactusjack" data-source="post: 2561465" data-attributes="member: 116841"><p>I have been spending the last couple days working up a load for my new rifle. In the process, I have come to learn that mean radius is a much more meaningful measure of precision than "MOA" (a measure of extreme spread). However, I cannot find any reference online espousing an acceptable standard for mean radius. Most claim "sub MOA" or "sub 1/2 MOA" as a good standard for accuracy. Do any of you use mean radius, and if so, what is the minimum goal? (obviously, lower is better!)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cactusjack, post: 2561465, member: 116841"] I have been spending the last couple days working up a load for my new rifle. In the process, I have come to learn that mean radius is a much more meaningful measure of precision than “MOA” (a measure of extreme spread). However, I cannot find any reference online espousing an acceptable standard for mean radius. Most claim “sub MOA” or “sub 1/2 MOA” as a good standard for accuracy. Do any of you use mean radius, and if so, what is the minimum goal? (obviously, lower is better!) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Standard of Precision
Top