Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Sorting Brass and Bullets?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mikecr" data-source="post: 1308413" data-attributes="member: 1521"><p>Very important in consideration of various sortings that people do, are the qualifying attributes behind each. It's often difficult to separate measurements into single attributes, so many measurements end up products of multiple things. And where you act on combinations standing unqualified, you could be merely screwing things up.</p><p></p><p>An example of this is where people sort bullets by base to ogive(BTO).</p><p>If you separated the individual attributes included in this one measure, and then plugged them in with all other bullet attributes to determine the final result, you would see that sorting BTO in itself was never a credible action, and rarely useful. In fact, it could be exactly the wrong action.</p><p>I'm confident testing would show this -with exception of huge anomalies(that's the value in the endeavor).</p><p></p><p>It helps to understand each individual attribute. That is, it's contribution potential good and bad.</p><p>Two cases weighing exactly the same can have significantly different H20 capacities. Think about why & how you should act on that. Two cases with same overall neck thickness, one having more variance than the other. What will that mean?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mikecr, post: 1308413, member: 1521"] Very important in consideration of various sortings that people do, are the qualifying attributes behind each. It's often difficult to separate measurements into single attributes, so many measurements end up products of multiple things. And where you act on combinations standing unqualified, you could be merely screwing things up. An example of this is where people sort bullets by base to ogive(BTO). If you separated the individual attributes included in this one measure, and then plugged them in with all other bullet attributes to determine the final result, you would see that sorting BTO in itself was never a credible action, and rarely useful. In fact, it could be exactly the wrong action. I'm confident testing would show this -with exception of huge anomalies(that's the value in the endeavor). It helps to understand each individual attribute. That is, it's contribution potential good and bad. Two cases weighing exactly the same can have significantly different H20 capacities. Think about why & how you should act on that. Two cases with same overall neck thickness, one having more variance than the other. What will that mean? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Sorting Brass and Bullets?
Top