Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Revic BLR 10b vs Sig Kilo 10k
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="D$tring" data-source="post: 3006287" data-attributes="member: 114263"><p>I have both. The Sig links to my kestrel and I use it for competitions it is never wrong. The revic has better glass processing time is just as fast and is always within .25 moa of the Sig kestrel combo. Both of them are usually exactly the same when I use them side by side. But again every once in a while .25 moa difference. I use the revic for hunting because the glass is so good and I only need one profile loaded. I thought I wouldn't like only having one profile but it is actually nice, because it avoids shooting the wrong drops - which I have accidentally done with previous range finders; and that sucks bad when you only have one shot. Plus it is surprisingly fast to switch profiles. Way faster than the Sig or the zeiss RF binos I had, because of how quickly it connects to your phone/app. If I had to pick only one I would pick the revic. The glass is really clear and good; good enough to use for spotting game and the app connection with your phone is quicker and easier to navigate than the Sig app. I have also ranged it almost twice as far as the Sig. the only thing I haven't done is checked them against each other in rain/snow. The Sig struggles a bit, I haven't had the revic out in anything other than light snow.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="D$tring, post: 3006287, member: 114263"] I have both. The Sig links to my kestrel and I use it for competitions it is never wrong. The revic has better glass processing time is just as fast and is always within .25 moa of the Sig kestrel combo. Both of them are usually exactly the same when I use them side by side. But again every once in a while .25 moa difference. I use the revic for hunting because the glass is so good and I only need one profile loaded. I thought I wouldn’t like only having one profile but it is actually nice, because it avoids shooting the wrong drops - which I have accidentally done with previous range finders; and that sucks bad when you only have one shot. Plus it is surprisingly fast to switch profiles. Way faster than the Sig or the zeiss RF binos I had, because of how quickly it connects to your phone/app. If I had to pick only one I would pick the revic. The glass is really clear and good; good enough to use for spotting game and the app connection with your phone is quicker and easier to navigate than the Sig app. I have also ranged it almost twice as far as the Sig. the only thing I haven’t done is checked them against each other in rain/snow. The Sig struggles a bit, I haven’t had the revic out in anything other than light snow. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Revic BLR 10b vs Sig Kilo 10k
Top