Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Remington under fire
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Boss Hoss" data-source="post: 434341" data-attributes="member: 5060"><p>I just had a conversation with Len and he has closed the poll thread. Consequently I will not be posting any further at his request however it suffices to say that there will be some who will support the Remington position as fervently as those that support the Obama regime and those that will with equal fervor oppose. The odd part about this is that Len has not even viewed the MSNBC story in question and does not know what information factual or not was even presented. His objection centers on the fact that there is only one side to the story which is pretty much true. On the other hand there will be no other side of the story except from Remington who has a very vested interest in protecting their solvency and we will see how they dispel the documentation presented last night most likely in actual litigation. Unfortunately my experience in this matter is somewhat tainted as an accidental discharge happened to me many years ago because of the issue in question.</p><p></p><p>If we were discussing a company who was not protected by statute this would have been settled long ago and my biggest fear is more LEGISLATION on the industry as a whole should Remington's attempt to defend itself go horribly wrong assuming they are innocent. So one might look at it thusly – should the allegations prove true then we are all going to suffer because of the hue and cry of the liberals for more oversight of the firearms manufacturing industry. That my friends would indeed be unfortunate. </p><p></p><p>IMHO Len is emotional but it is his sandbox and I respect that, because when you are in someone else's house you abide by their rules arbitrary by emotion or not or leave. No more posts from me on this and let's all try to avoid any controversial subjects. </p><p></p><p>Anybody do any research on the yaw effect of non uniformed meplats vs uniformed meplats at 1k on the 142gr SMK????</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Boss Hoss, post: 434341, member: 5060"] I just had a conversation with Len and he has closed the poll thread. Consequently I will not be posting any further at his request however it suffices to say that there will be some who will support the Remington position as fervently as those that support the Obama regime and those that will with equal fervor oppose. The odd part about this is that Len has not even viewed the MSNBC story in question and does not know what information factual or not was even presented. His objection centers on the fact that there is only one side to the story which is pretty much true. On the other hand there will be no other side of the story except from Remington who has a very vested interest in protecting their solvency and we will see how they dispel the documentation presented last night most likely in actual litigation. Unfortunately my experience in this matter is somewhat tainted as an accidental discharge happened to me many years ago because of the issue in question. If we were discussing a company who was not protected by statute this would have been settled long ago and my biggest fear is more LEGISLATION on the industry as a whole should Remington’s attempt to defend itself go horribly wrong assuming they are innocent. So one might look at it thusly – should the allegations prove true then we are all going to suffer because of the hue and cry of the liberals for more oversight of the firearms manufacturing industry. That my friends would indeed be unfortunate. IMHO Len is emotional but it is his sandbox and I respect that, because when you are in someone else’s house you abide by their rules arbitrary by emotion or not or leave. No more posts from me on this and let’s all try to avoid any controversial subjects. Anybody do any research on the yaw effect of non uniformed meplats vs uniformed meplats at 1k on the 142gr SMK???? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Remington under fire
Top