Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Relative burn rates from fastest to slowest (issued by Hodgdon/IMR) Nov 2019
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rflshootr" data-source="post: 1969106" data-attributes="member: 10284"><p>Yep H414 and W760 are the same powders. Hodgdon decided to stop labeling it as H414 and just go with the W760. I actually called Hodgdon when the new relative burn rate chart came out and noticed that H414 was missing, and got the word straight from the horses mouth. If you look at any load data on Hodgdon's site that show both powders, you'll notice that the charge weights and velocities are identical.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rflshootr, post: 1969106, member: 10284"] Yep H414 and W760 are the same powders. Hodgdon decided to stop labeling it as H414 and just go with the W760. I actually called Hodgdon when the new relative burn rate chart came out and noticed that H414 was missing, and got the word straight from the horses mouth. If you look at any load data on Hodgdon's site that show both powders, you'll notice that the charge weights and velocities are identical. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Relative burn rates from fastest to slowest (issued by Hodgdon/IMR) Nov 2019
Top