Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Reducing ES
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Buckreed" data-source="post: 2116519" data-attributes="member: 103984"><p>Yes, I did choose two loads from my ladder based on velocities. The original ladder was at 0.2gr increments. For example;</p><p>43.2 2595</p><p>43.4 2590</p><p>43.6 2599</p><p>43.8 2646</p><p></p><p>So I chose 43.5 as one area to test since this was in the middle of an area that had small velocity changes with increasing charges. I was surprised to see a larger ES for 5 shots with all the same charge. The fact that I got a larger ES in 5 of the same charge than those with incremental increases is what made me think that something else is going on here. I assume I'm doing something wrong.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Buckreed, post: 2116519, member: 103984"] Yes, I did choose two loads from my ladder based on velocities. The original ladder was at 0.2gr increments. For example; 43.2 2595 43.4 2590 43.6 2599 43.8 2646 So I chose 43.5 as one area to test since this was in the middle of an area that had small velocity changes with increasing charges. I was surprised to see a larger ES for 5 shots with all the same charge. The fact that I got a larger ES in 5 of the same charge than those with incremental increases is what made me think that something else is going on here. I assume I'm doing something wrong. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Reducing ES
Top