Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Proof Barrels And Shermans.....WOW !
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pdvdh" data-source="post: 2487410" data-attributes="member: 4191"><p>If it's plain as day, a lot of members on this Forum remain uninformed. Does Proof promote their barrels as having tight bores for purposes of improved precision. I've not seen it if they do.</p><p></p><p>I know of very few long range hunters that say that don't place some premium on muzzle velocity. Actually, I don't know any that wouldn't take some additional velocity, provided precision was maintained, for the downrange performance improvements that higher MV provides.</p><p></p><p>Perhaps you hunt at closer ranges. So don't appreciate the additional MV.</p><p></p><p>Proof thinking they'll strictly lose Sherman shooters would be wishful thinking, at best. Tighter than necessary bores reduce MV, no matter the cartridge chambering.</p><p></p><p>All in all, I read your post a couple times now, but can't follow the logic.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pdvdh, post: 2487410, member: 4191"] If it's plain as day, a lot of members on this Forum remain uninformed. Does Proof promote their barrels as having tight bores for purposes of improved precision. I've not seen it if they do. I know of very few long range hunters that say that don't place some premium on muzzle velocity. Actually, I don't know any that wouldn't take some additional velocity, provided precision was maintained, for the downrange performance improvements that higher MV provides. Perhaps you hunt at closer ranges. So don't appreciate the additional MV. Proof thinking they'll strictly lose Sherman shooters would be wishful thinking, at best. Tighter than necessary bores reduce MV, no matter the cartridge chambering. All in all, I read your post a couple times now, but can't follow the logic. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Proof Barrels And Shermans.....WOW !
Top