Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Partition vs TTSX vs Bondstrike
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hand Skills" data-source="post: 2091566" data-attributes="member: 103303"><p>I wouldn't count on it. Barnes bullets tend to hold together and retain nearly all their weight. There's no 'frag' effect unless you hit bone on the way in</p><p></p><p>The partitions I have recovered shed 30-40% of their weight. They frag even if only soft tissue is encountered.</p><p></p><p>The wound channels look very different.</p><p></p><p>On one hand, dead is dead, but on the other, not all bullets are created equal.</p><p></p><p>All I can say is; you like the Nosler partition, you will love hammer bullets.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hand Skills, post: 2091566, member: 103303"] I wouldn't count on it. Barnes bullets tend to hold together and retain nearly all their weight. There's no 'frag' effect unless you hit bone on the way in The partitions I have recovered shed 30-40% of their weight. They frag even if only soft tissue is encountered. The wound channels look very different. On one hand, dead is dead, but on the other, not all bullets are created equal. All I can say is; you like the Nosler partition, you will love hammer bullets. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Partition vs TTSX vs Bondstrike
Top