Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Old Bullets OK
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RAGGED EDGE" data-source="post: 1746265" data-attributes="member: 49669"><p>They were .270s'. I did not have one at the time. It's my "go to" rifle now. Wish I hadn't sold them for 3X the price I paid for them. BC was not so good. They were really a semi-spitzer, like the 200-grain, screw-machine Partitions I have squirreled away for the old '06. Maybe Bill Steigers thought there could be a stabilization problem if he made them more pointy. From what I've read and heard, performance on game was about as good as it gets. Mushrooms the size of a dime with great weight retention. If HAWK sold bonded bullets they would be about the same thing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RAGGED EDGE, post: 1746265, member: 49669"] They were .270s'. I did not have one at the time. It's my "go to" rifle now. Wish I hadn't sold them for 3X the price I paid for them. BC was not so good. They were really a semi-spitzer, like the 200-grain, screw-machine Partitions I have squirreled away for the old '06. Maybe Bill Steigers thought there could be a stabilization problem if he made them more pointy. From what I've read and heard, performance on game was about as good as it gets. Mushrooms the size of a dime with great weight retention. If HAWK sold bonded bullets they would be about the same thing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Old Bullets OK
Top