Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
NX8 an upgrade?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="shooters" data-source="post: 2391201" data-attributes="member: 7769"><p>Well I'm glad you took my scope recommendation as saying "losing zero isn't a big deal." </p><p>Anyhow, From my experience, it has been that most of the time when a scope has lost zero, the finger is always pointed at the optic, but more times than not it's base/rings that have moved. It seems few ever consider what's actually holding the optic in place. Just a thought.</p><p></p><p>P.S. I've sent 2 NF in over the years for issues. One tracking and one parallax. Both were ATACR's. It's happens to the best optics.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="shooters, post: 2391201, member: 7769"] Well I’m glad you took my scope recommendation as saying “losing zero isn’t a big deal.” Anyhow, From my experience, it has been that most of the time when a scope has lost zero, the finger is always pointed at the optic, but more times than not it’s base/rings that have moved. It seems few ever consider what’s actually holding the optic in place. Just a thought. P.S. I’ve sent 2 NF in over the years for issues. One tracking and one parallax. Both were ATACR’s. It’s happens to the best optics. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
NX8 an upgrade?
Top