Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Nightforce ATACR 5-25x56 SFP Enhanced MOAR vs MOAR-T
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Greyfox" data-source="post: 1356472" data-attributes="member: 10291"><p>I went through the same decision process when ai sought an ATACR for my 300WM Hunting Rifle to be used for deer to 1000 yards. I was fortunate to be able to use both reticles before making the decision. The actual difference in reticle size between the two at 1000 yards amounts to less then 1 inch. Depending on the individuals eyes, lighting, and target background conditions, the more subjective difference and benefit of the slightly thicker MOAR reticle can be more pronounced. This is likely the reason that both styles are offered by NF. For hunting I like the cards stacked in my favor. Being primarily a deer hunter, there usually isn't too much time to fuss with lighted reticles when the opportunity at a big old buck presents itself. Shooting smallish targets at ELR, the MOAR-t certainly feels more precise and due to the greater difficulty in controlling variables at these ranges, the added precision of the MOAR-t can help stack the deck in your favor. Ultimately, choice between the two is subtle, and very much dependent the individuals preferences and priorities. IMO.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Greyfox, post: 1356472, member: 10291"] I went through the same decision process when ai sought an ATACR for my 300WM Hunting Rifle to be used for deer to 1000 yards. I was fortunate to be able to use both reticles before making the decision. The actual difference in reticle size between the two at 1000 yards amounts to less then 1 inch. Depending on the individuals eyes, lighting, and target background conditions, the more subjective difference and benefit of the slightly thicker MOAR reticle can be more pronounced. This is likely the reason that both styles are offered by NF. For hunting I like the cards stacked in my favor. Being primarily a deer hunter, there usually isn’t too much time to fuss with lighted reticles when the opportunity at a big old buck presents itself. Shooting smallish targets at ELR, the MOAR-t certainly feels more precise and due to the greater difficulty in controlling variables at these ranges, the added precision of the MOAR-t can help stack the deck in your favor. Ultimately, choice between the two is subtle, and very much dependent the individuals preferences and priorities. IMO. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Nightforce ATACR 5-25x56 SFP Enhanced MOAR vs MOAR-T
Top