Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Neck Tension vs Bullet Seating & Release Pressure - Lessons Learned
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mikecr" data-source="post: 2769104" data-attributes="member: 1521"><p>My neck sizing standard centers on consistent bullet release.</p><p>That's it. Everything else takes care of itself.</p><p>I don't need excess grip, excess clearance, nor excess alignment themes.</p><p>This is my typical, as merely eyeballed & setup good enough for fire forming/testing:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]445872[/ATTACH]</p><p>Many times I just end up sticking with a setting like this. No reason to change it.</p><p>Now I could change it. I could size another 1/16" here,, still be on bearing,, a bit more tension/MV.</p><p>But here's the thing; I have plenty of frictional and static grip. The necks are not over-worked. This is so easy to EXACTLY reproduce, over & over & over (unlimited reloads).</p><p></p><p>In contrast, I discourage ANYONE from EVER doing THIS.</p><p>A FL sized neck:</p><p> [ATTACH=full]445876[/ATTACH]</p><p>The tension here is way higher, and you can bet it's variance is as well.</p><p>You have donut area, which is always inconsistent, brought into tension.</p><p>And you have unsized neck binding against the bearing-base junction.</p><p>No doubt over time this will push the bullet outward, changing CBTO, and changing tension.</p><p>Speaking of CBTO, good luck fighting to get each round at desired while using your bullets for this kind of neck expansion.</p><p>These necks will not likely produce low loaded runout either.</p><p>There is nothing 'good' in this plan.</p><p>My vote for world's ugliest neck: [ATTACH=full]445892[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mikecr, post: 2769104, member: 1521"] My neck sizing standard centers on consistent bullet release. That's it. Everything else takes care of itself. I don't need excess grip, excess clearance, nor excess alignment themes. This is my typical, as merely eyeballed & setup good enough for fire forming/testing: [ATTACH type="full" alt="NSoption1.jpg"]445872[/ATTACH] Many times I just end up sticking with a setting like this. No reason to change it. Now I could change it. I could size another 1/16" here,, still be on bearing,, a bit more tension/MV. But here's the thing; I have plenty of frictional and static grip. The necks are not over-worked. This is so easy to EXACTLY reproduce, over & over & over (unlimited reloads). In contrast, I discourage ANYONE from EVER doing THIS. A FL sized neck: [ATTACH type="full" alt="FLsizedNECK2.jpg"]445876[/ATTACH] The tension here is way higher, and you can bet it's variance is as well. You have donut area, which is always inconsistent, brought into tension. And you have unsized neck binding against the bearing-base junction. No doubt over time this will push the bullet outward, changing CBTO, and changing tension. Speaking of CBTO, good luck fighting to get each round at desired while using your bullets for this kind of neck expansion. These necks will not likely produce low loaded runout either. There is nothing 'good' in this plan. My vote for world's ugliest neck: [ATTACH type="full" alt="WUN.jpg"]445892[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Neck Tension vs Bullet Seating & Release Pressure - Lessons Learned
Top