Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Meanwhile on RS they're killin bear, deer, elk , and moose with .223 and 77gr TMK.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="memtb" data-source="post: 2957089" data-attributes="member: 75451"><p>I fall, "very heavily", into the I want an exit crowd!</p><p></p><p> I've yet to have killing issues with my chosen bullets that generally retain almost 100% of their original bullet weight.</p><p></p><p> While my permanent wound channel my be smaller than that of a frangible bullet……my wound channel being much longer provides opportunity for more tissue/bone/structure/vascular due to that much longer path!</p><p></p><p> Neither do I follow the fallacy pertaining to the animals absorbing all of the "energy" contributing to a higher percentage of kills! I've yet to see a big game animal, any big game animal, taken off of their feet when hit with a bit over 5000 ft/lbs energy! In fact, often there is no sign of being hit, unless support structure bones or CNS is hit. Yet, these very same animals traveled a very short distance before expiring! Apparently, these high weight retention, exiting bullets will effectively kill! memtb</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="memtb, post: 2957089, member: 75451"] I fall, “very heavily“, into the I want an exit crowd! I've yet to have killing issues with my chosen bullets that generally retain almost 100% of their original bullet weight. While my permanent wound channel my be smaller than that of a frangible bullet……my wound channel being much longer provides opportunity for more tissue/bone/structure/vascular due to that much longer path! Neither do I follow the fallacy pertaining to the animals absorbing all of the "energy" contributing to a higher percentage of kills! I've yet to see a big game animal, any big game animal, taken off of their feet when hit with a bit over 5000 ft/lbs energy! In fact, often there is no sign of being hit, unless support structure bones or CNS is hit. Yet, these very same animals traveled a very short distance before expiring! Apparently, these high weight retention, exiting bullets will effectively kill! memtb [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Meanwhile on RS they're killin bear, deer, elk , and moose with .223 and 77gr TMK.
Top