Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Equipment Discussions
McMillan Stock Recomendations
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="David P. Herne" data-source="post: 44115" data-attributes="member: 29"><p>Sheldon,</p><p>As long as you don't plan on lugging it around alot, then there's absolutely no question as to which McMillan stock should be your choice for that .300 RUM project . . . McHale!!! Even as much as Ian praises this stock, he's still understating it's merits. It has the thickest/deepest **** belly of any stock I've ever seen that isn't a .50 BMG stock. And the neck and forearm are as massive as they can be in a stock that is still ergonomic and/or reasonably supple. In fact, it's one of the few McMillan stocks that isn't a .50 BMG stock that can be inletted for Nesika Bay Precision receivers having outside diameters of 1.470". To illustrate even better, think of a stock that isn't a .50 BMG stock that would still be truly appropriate for use in a .408 Cheyenne Tactical project. What you're thinking is probably pretty close to what the McHale is!!!</p><p></p><p>Dave</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="David P. Herne, post: 44115, member: 29"] Sheldon, As long as you don't plan on lugging it around alot, then there's absolutely no question as to which McMillan stock should be your choice for that .300 RUM project . . . McHale!!! Even as much as Ian praises this stock, he's still understating it's merits. It has the thickest/deepest **** belly of any stock I've ever seen that isn't a .50 BMG stock. And the neck and forearm are as massive as they can be in a stock that is still ergonomic and/or reasonably supple. In fact, it's one of the few McMillan stocks that isn't a .50 BMG stock that can be inletted for Nesika Bay Precision receivers having outside diameters of 1.470". To illustrate even better, think of a stock that isn't a .50 BMG stock that would still be truly appropriate for use in a .408 Cheyenne Tactical project. What you're thinking is probably pretty close to what the McHale is!!! Dave [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Equipment Discussions
McMillan Stock Recomendations
Top