Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Magnetospeed vs labradar
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="alcesgigas" data-source="post: 1576531" data-attributes="member: 34925"><p>Wasn't going to comment here because I've never used or even seen a LR. However, there's been several arguments downing the MS due the barrel attach task as well as the potential for POI shift. I've had the V2 since it came out--got it from Len--and the first time I used it was at -44 (February in the Arctic) and I pre-mounted everything to limit the bare handed chores, etc. Only fired three shots to check the unit and my enthusiasm. The former proved true; the latter I've never been able to shake. Just knew I wouldn't like the belt on barrel bayonet so began building mounts that were more secure, maintained consistency, and had absolutely no effect/affect on POI. Only once did I have trouble and it was my own fault. Shooting in winter again and without the preparedness earlier mentioned proved once again that haste makes waste and atomized the bayo's end.</p><p>Long story short; I planned to market my mount gizmos, but soon learned that there are other "remote" mounts commercially available and there's even a Facebook group dedicated to the MagnetoSpeed. These units are quality serviceable affairs that produce consistent reliability. I have no intentions of divorcing my MS, but someday I might fall prey to that earlier mentioned enthusiasm and get the LR.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="alcesgigas, post: 1576531, member: 34925"] Wasn't going to comment here because I've never used or even seen a LR. However, there's been several arguments downing the MS due the barrel attach task as well as the potential for POI shift. I've had the V2 since it came out--got it from Len--and the first time I used it was at -44 (February in the Arctic) and I pre-mounted everything to limit the bare handed chores, etc. Only fired three shots to check the unit and my enthusiasm. The former proved true; the latter I've never been able to shake. Just knew I wouldn't like the belt on barrel bayonet so began building mounts that were more secure, maintained consistency, and had absolutely no effect/affect on POI. Only once did I have trouble and it was my own fault. Shooting in winter again and without the preparedness earlier mentioned proved once again that haste makes waste and atomized the bayo's end. Long story short; I planned to market my mount gizmos, but soon learned that there are other "remote" mounts commercially available and there's even a Facebook group dedicated to the MagnetoSpeed. These units are quality serviceable affairs that produce consistent reliability. I have no intentions of divorcing my MS, but someday I might fall prey to that earlier mentioned enthusiasm and get the LR. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Magnetospeed vs labradar
Top