Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Long Range .30s
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Overkill338" data-source="post: 338911" data-attributes="member: 110473"><p>I went with a .300 RUM, due to the brass being cheaper and easier to get. Plus it came in the rifle I wanted (Rem Sendero). I've always been a fan of the .338's, and would have probably went with a .338 RUM if the SF-II had been available in it. But I don't think there is a creature in North America that will shrug off a 210gr VLD leaving out at 3100 fps.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>So I go with what a lot of these guys have said, get the .300 RUM. It was this site that influenced my decision as well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Overkill338, post: 338911, member: 110473"] I went with a .300 RUM, due to the brass being cheaper and easier to get. Plus it came in the rifle I wanted (Rem Sendero). I've always been a fan of the .338's, and would have probably went with a .338 RUM if the SF-II had been available in it. But I don't think there is a creature in North America that will shrug off a 210gr VLD leaving out at 3100 fps. So I go with what a lot of these guys have said, get the .300 RUM. It was this site that influenced my decision as well. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Long Range .30s
Top