Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Long Range .30s
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MontanaRifleman" data-source="post: 338711" data-attributes="member: 11717"><p>LTLR, it's interesting to read your experience with the 30-338 LMImp compared to the RUM. it seems to support the theory that the relatively fatter cartridges are a little more effiicent, as in the WSMs. The 300 WSM uses about 10% less powder than the 300 WM for close to the same velocity and probably (on average) has maybe double the barrel life. I wonder if the same holds true for the Dakota cartridges? Do you have any experience with the straight 30-338 LM vs the RUM?</p><p> </p><p>Mark</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MontanaRifleman, post: 338711, member: 11717"] LTLR, it's interesting to read your experience with the 30-338 LMImp compared to the RUM. it seems to support the theory that the relatively fatter cartridges are a little more effiicent, as in the WSMs. The 300 WSM uses about 10% less powder than the 300 WM for close to the same velocity and probably (on average) has maybe double the barrel life. I wonder if the same holds true for the Dakota cartridges? Do you have any experience with the straight 30-338 LM vs the RUM? Mark [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Long Range .30s
Top