Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Loaded up my first hammers this evening
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Calvin45" data-source="post: 2698486" data-attributes="member: 109862"><p>I do still care about bc, it's not just a matter of highest muzzle velocity. Hammer does make a 67 grain shock hammer. Might go a tad faster. Won't stay faster for any distance at all. And I do yhink the 124 or 137 in your RUM makes a lot more sense than the 101 FOR FLAT TRAJECTORY. yeah some would say their all impractical but the point of these loads for me is maximum point blank and hold on hair range and emphatic "poleaxe" killing via extreme velocity within that range. I think your 124 would actually have a greater hold on hair allowance and mpbr and kill more emphatically at 400 yards. </p><p></p><p>Same reason I went with the 120 Barnes tac tx and not the 110 in my .300 win load. It actually ends up shooting flatter.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Calvin45, post: 2698486, member: 109862"] I do still care about bc, it’s not just a matter of highest muzzle velocity. Hammer does make a 67 grain shock hammer. Might go a tad faster. Won’t stay faster for any distance at all. And I do yhink the 124 or 137 in your RUM makes a lot more sense than the 101 FOR FLAT TRAJECTORY. yeah some would say their all impractical but the point of these loads for me is maximum point blank and hold on hair range and emphatic “poleaxe” killing via extreme velocity within that range. I think your 124 would actually have a greater hold on hair allowance and mpbr and kill more emphatically at 400 yards. Same reason I went with the 120 Barnes tac tx and not the 110 in my .300 win load. It actually ends up shooting flatter. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Loaded up my first hammers this evening
Top