Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
LEUPOLD VX6HD FRUSTRATION!!!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tomjoad" data-source="post: 2679791" data-attributes="member: 117325"><p>Not trying to get any knickers in a bunch but there are some pretty stout and objective scope field evaluations <a href="https://www.rokslide.com/forums/forums/rifle-scope-field-evaluations.133/" target="_blank"><u><strong>here</strong></u></a> that uncover some generally terrible performance across many brands. The gentleman who runs the testing puts an ungodly number of rounds down range and isn't on any optic company's payroll. I find it nice to read some objective testing data not based on emotional attachment or "I've owned x scope for x years and it's fine"</p><p></p><p>Leupold mark 5 failed, Swaro fails, Zeiss fails, Tract Toric fails, Vortex <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🤯" title="Exploding head :exploding_head:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f92f.png" data-shortname=":exploding_head:" />. I have not read through all but the only scopes passing all tests I found are Nightforce, SWFA, and Schmidt & Bender.</p><p></p><p>The tests are pretty good entertainment if you have some time to kill:</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.rokslide.com/forums/forums/rifle-scope-field-evaluations.133/[/URL]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tomjoad, post: 2679791, member: 117325"] Not trying to get any knickers in a bunch but there are some pretty stout and objective scope field evaluations [URL='https://www.rokslide.com/forums/forums/rifle-scope-field-evaluations.133/'][U][B]here[/B][/U][/URL] that uncover some generally terrible performance across many brands. The gentleman who runs the testing puts an ungodly number of rounds down range and isn’t on any optic company’s payroll. I find it nice to read some objective testing data not based on emotional attachment or “I’ve owned x scope for x years and it’s fine” Leupold mark 5 failed, Swaro fails, Zeiss fails, Tract Toric fails, Vortex 🤯. I have not read through all but the only scopes passing all tests I found are Nightforce, SWFA, and Schmidt & Bender. The tests are pretty good entertainment if you have some time to kill: [URL unfurl="true"]https://www.rokslide.com/forums/forums/rifle-scope-field-evaluations.133/[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
LEUPOLD VX6HD FRUSTRATION!!!!
Top