Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Leupold vs. Nightforce Reticle Comparison
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Full Curl" data-source="post: 2747322" data-attributes="member: 47602"><p>Looking to get some opinions on reticles for a LR hunting rifle. I have a few different scopes/reticles in my safe I'm considering for a new .284 build that should be done soon.</p><p></p><p>Leupold 18x IMPACT-29 MOA</p><p>Nightforce 32x MOAR-CF2D</p><p>Nightforce 20x MOAR-CF2</p><p></p><p>All are illuminated and SFP. I have extensive experience with only the Leupold TMOA which I really like. I have no issues clearly seeing it at short or long distances under high or low light and hardly ever need to use the illumination feature. The line thickness fits me very well.</p><p></p><p>How do the other 3 reticles listed compare to the TMOA, not so much in reticle operation, but function as far as clarity and ability to see at low light for hunting purposes? The main crosshair line thickness subtensions are all very similar from .095 to .01 MOA. When I look through the IMPACT-29 and the MOAR's they just don't seem as "thick" as the TMOA. Any offered insight or experience with these reticles for real world hunting applications would be appreciated. Thank you.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Full Curl, post: 2747322, member: 47602"] Looking to get some opinions on reticles for a LR hunting rifle. I have a few different scopes/reticles in my safe I'm considering for a new .284 build that should be done soon. Leupold 18x IMPACT-29 MOA Nightforce 32x MOAR-CF2D Nightforce 20x MOAR-CF2 All are illuminated and SFP. I have extensive experience with only the Leupold TMOA which I really like. I have no issues clearly seeing it at short or long distances under high or low light and hardly ever need to use the illumination feature. The line thickness fits me very well. How do the other 3 reticles listed compare to the TMOA, not so much in reticle operation, but function as far as clarity and ability to see at low light for hunting purposes? The main crosshair line thickness subtensions are all very similar from .095 to .01 MOA. When I look through the IMPACT-29 and the MOAR's they just don't seem as "thick" as the TMOA. Any offered insight or experience with these reticles for real world hunting applications would be appreciated. Thank you. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Leupold vs. Nightforce Reticle Comparison
Top