Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Leupold lrp ?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sflutes" data-source="post: 1583322" data-attributes="member: 106464"><p>I have two of the 6.5-20x50 and a buddy has one as well. All on some kind of custom 6mm something or other.</p><p></p><p>I own a SHV NF as well. 5-20x56</p><p></p><p>The TMOA reticle is in my opinion an easier reticle to look at than the MOAR on the NF. The MOAR seems to get just a tad thick for my liking at higher power.</p><p></p><p>The scope tracks very well, ive ran both my guns up, down, up and down and have always had it return to zero as well as come up the correct MOA needed.</p><p></p><p>The zero stop Leupolds uses is very well thought out and simple to use.</p><p></p><p>15 MOA of elevation per turn, windage dials are labeled right and left. The windage turret also comes with a thread protector if you choose to take the cap off and leave it off.</p><p></p><p>Glass is very good. I think it's as clear as my SHV. It might give up a little to the SHV in brightness. However objective lens are different shapes and sizes.</p><p></p><p>The SHV seems to focus for my eyes slightly better than the LRP. I.e on my orange paster with black center, the black center is more defined with the SHV than the LRP.</p><p></p><p>LOTS of elevation adjustment in the LRP. I believe the 6.5-20 has 90 moa both wind and elevation. The 4.5-14 has 120.</p><p></p><p>For the money I think it's a hard scope to beat. The SHV is possibly a little better optic but it also costs another 300-400 dollars depending on model and if weight is a concern the Leupold is hands down the choice to go with. </p><p></p><p>Overall I wouldn't hesitate to buy another LRP.</p><p></p><p>My only wish is they made an MOA version of the scope in FFP.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sflutes, post: 1583322, member: 106464"] I have two of the 6.5-20x50 and a buddy has one as well. All on some kind of custom 6mm something or other. I own a SHV NF as well. 5-20x56 The TMOA reticle is in my opinion an easier reticle to look at than the MOAR on the NF. The MOAR seems to get just a tad thick for my liking at higher power. The scope tracks very well, ive ran both my guns up, down, up and down and have always had it return to zero as well as come up the correct MOA needed. The zero stop Leupolds uses is very well thought out and simple to use. 15 MOA of elevation per turn, windage dials are labeled right and left. The windage turret also comes with a thread protector if you choose to take the cap off and leave it off. Glass is very good. I think it's as clear as my SHV. It might give up a little to the SHV in brightness. However objective lens are different shapes and sizes. The SHV seems to focus for my eyes slightly better than the LRP. I.e on my orange paster with black center, the black center is more defined with the SHV than the LRP. LOTS of elevation adjustment in the LRP. I believe the 6.5-20 has 90 moa both wind and elevation. The 4.5-14 has 120. For the money I think it's a hard scope to beat. The SHV is possibly a little better optic but it also costs another 300-400 dollars depending on model and if weight is a concern the Leupold is hands down the choice to go with. Overall I wouldn't hesitate to buy another LRP. My only wish is they made an MOA version of the scope in FFP. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Leupold lrp ?
Top