Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Kimber Montana .30-06
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RichJD13" data-source="post: 1029441" data-attributes="member: 86795"><p>Kimba, your reply seems to directly contradict what Sable said. Unless I've missread something. Can you please clarify?</p><p></p><p>I was thinking that because I have a thin barrel the contact point might exist to support the barrel under recoil and control some of the "whip." Your reply confirms that, at least how I read it, and sable's reply seems to contradict that.</p><p></p><p>Would it be better to either completely free float the barrel or completely bed the barrel under the stock rather than have a small contact point?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RichJD13, post: 1029441, member: 86795"] Kimba, your reply seems to directly contradict what Sable said. Unless I've missread something. Can you please clarify? I was thinking that because I have a thin barrel the contact point might exist to support the barrel under recoil and control some of the "whip." Your reply confirms that, at least how I read it, and sable's reply seems to contradict that. Would it be better to either completely free float the barrel or completely bed the barrel under the stock rather than have a small contact point? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Kimber Montana .30-06
Top