Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Interesting test on top tier scopes.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="flyguy1" data-source="post: 2581779" data-attributes="member: 92595"><p>You know, and I know this isn't practical, so I don't blame the investigator at all, but if you wanted to be rigorous about testing, you would grab 20 or so of each scope, cover them all with black cloth, so the tester doesn't know the brand name, and then test. Then show variability within each scope, and then compare with other scopes.</p><p></p><p>At the very least, though, the tester should not know which scope he is looking through.</p><p></p><p>You simply can't overcome operator bias, no matter how honest you are. That's why stuff is blinded in studies.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="flyguy1, post: 2581779, member: 92595"] You know, and I know this isn't practical, so I don't blame the investigator at all, but if you wanted to be rigorous about testing, you would grab 20 or so of each scope, cover them all with black cloth, so the tester doesn't know the brand name, and then test. Then show variability within each scope, and then compare with other scopes. At the very least, though, the tester should not know which scope he is looking through. You simply can't overcome operator bias, no matter how honest you are. That's why stuff is blinded in studies. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Interesting test on top tier scopes.
Top