Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Improving the 308 Win performance
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SSgt G Cody" data-source="post: 2732514" data-attributes="member: 113303"><p><strong>Hmmm. I have both .308 and 30-06, plus AI versions of both. The 30-06 is much stronger in both versions, via 10% more powder and 40% more terminal performance. After 50 years as the standard sniper 30-06 round/rifle for the US Army and Marine shooters, replaced for 20 years with the .308, and now they've corrected their mistake and gone to the 300WM as their standard choice, for good reason. Bullet choice from 180, 190, 168, and now 200gn., and 1000+yds, 900yds, and now 1200+yds. The logic is quite obvious.</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SSgt G Cody, post: 2732514, member: 113303"] [B]Hmmm. I have both .308 and 30-06, plus AI versions of both. The 30-06 is much stronger in both versions, via 10% more powder and 40% more terminal performance. After 50 years as the standard sniper 30-06 round/rifle for the US Army and Marine shooters, replaced for 20 years with the .308, and now they've corrected their mistake and gone to the 300WM as their standard choice, for good reason. Bullet choice from 180, 190, 168, and now 200gn., and 1000+yds, 900yds, and now 1200+yds. The logic is quite obvious.[/B] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Improving the 308 Win performance
Top