Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Hornady 4DOF Ballistic Program
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BryanLitz" data-source="post: 1227635" data-attributes="member: 7848"><p>That's not true. By attaching the acoustic microphone to a hard target, you can detect tof even for subsonic rounds with very high resolution.</p><p></p><p></p><p>We did measure MV and all other variables required to calculate the bullet's performance. You can criticize all you want, but with just a couple weeks preparation with a brand new bullet, our characterization of the bullets performance in the AB solver was accurate enough to put FIRST SHOTS on targets out to 2400+ yards.</p><p></p><p> actually, all the radar measures directly is velocity. tof comes from a clock, and distance is a derived, not measured quantity.</p><p></p><p> How could you separate out the zero yaw drag coefficient from the yaw dependent drag with just a radar?</p><p></p><p></p><p>I was describing these radars because you pulled out my reference from 2005 about radar being the cadillac of drag measurement. The best radar is all that. Hornady's radar is the budget model, and it's not capable of all the stuff we you were describing about radar in general. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>My objective is to help those readers who are interested in learning. If the truth of things upsets anyone then you don't have to read my posts. If anyone can demonstrate anything I'm saying that's untrue, I'll be happy to correct it. But if you're just arguing because you don't like it, I don't know what else to tell you.</p><p></p><p>-Bryan</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BryanLitz, post: 1227635, member: 7848"] That's not true. By attaching the acoustic microphone to a hard target, you can detect tof even for subsonic rounds with very high resolution. We did measure MV and all other variables required to calculate the bullet's performance. You can criticize all you want, but with just a couple weeks preparation with a brand new bullet, our characterization of the bullets performance in the AB solver was accurate enough to put FIRST SHOTS on targets out to 2400+ yards. actually, all the radar measures directly is velocity. tof comes from a clock, and distance is a derived, not measured quantity. How could you separate out the zero yaw drag coefficient from the yaw dependent drag with just a radar? I was describing these radars because you pulled out my reference from 2005 about radar being the cadillac of drag measurement. The best radar is all that. Hornady's radar is the budget model, and it's not capable of all the stuff we you were describing about radar in general. My objective is to help those readers who are interested in learning. If the truth of things upsets anyone then you don't have to read my posts. If anyone can demonstrate anything I'm saying that's untrue, I'll be happy to correct it. But if you're just arguing because you don't like it, I don't know what else to tell you. -Bryan [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Hornady 4DOF Ballistic Program
Top