Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Heavy vs Light Long Range Rifle
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 46119" data-source="post: 1001911"><p>I'm sorry to do this in public. I wish I felt it could be effective in private. </p><p></p><p>Broz/Jeff,</p><p></p><p>Chill, I don't get where all this agro comes from.</p><p></p><p>I considered backing off but I just can't let falsehoods stand.</p><p></p><p>From my perspective, you seem to be very agro and hung up on being 'right' or 'your way'. </p><p></p><p>All this I responded to your post, you responded to my post is IMO BS. You write as if ... well, ,as if you don't want to allow a discussion.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Do you really believe I checked some other source for the spec weight instead of Wby? Innuendo used to discredit your debate opponent, IMO not a friendly discussion method.</p><p></p><p>When I said I went to Weatherby and touched the rifles did you think it was BS? IMO: Another very poor debate or discussion technique. Yes, indeed, Weatherby is across town from my house, they have a show room with all the current models and some historic pieces as well. Visitors can touch, lift, cycle and generally fondle the firearm porn. A bare TRR is much heavier than a bare Accumark. EOS. Yes, the website is "wrong". If you want to do something about it call Weatherby, maybe you can pull a Courtney on them and "make them" fix it but there was no need to go off on me.</p><p></p><p>I qualified my first post with IIWM which is "if it were me" and IMO which is "in my opinion". You took that went to the Wby website, quoted the spec there and used it as a whinny, your wrong, your wrong, your wrong tantrum. What's up with that?</p><p></p><p>My next post qualified why I think the Wby website is wrong. Then you went postal. All you needed to say was yes please go to Weatherby with a scale but that would have entered empirical data into the discussion.</p><p></p><p>Dude, take a chill pill and stop living in the world of "gotta get Seaman". Well, that's what is seems like to me. I only gave my opinion and what I would do as a contribution to the discussion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 46119, post: 1001911"] I'm sorry to do this in public. I wish I felt it could be effective in private. Broz/Jeff, Chill, I don't get where all this agro comes from. I considered backing off but I just can't let falsehoods stand. From my perspective, you seem to be very agro and hung up on being 'right' or 'your way'. All this I responded to your post, you responded to my post is IMO BS. You write as if ... well, ,as if you don't want to allow a discussion. Do you really believe I checked some other source for the spec weight instead of Wby? Innuendo used to discredit your debate opponent, IMO not a friendly discussion method. When I said I went to Weatherby and touched the rifles did you think it was BS? IMO: Another very poor debate or discussion technique. Yes, indeed, Weatherby is across town from my house, they have a show room with all the current models and some historic pieces as well. Visitors can touch, lift, cycle and generally fondle the firearm porn. A bare TRR is much heavier than a bare Accumark. EOS. Yes, the website is "wrong". If you want to do something about it call Weatherby, maybe you can pull a Courtney on them and "make them" fix it but there was no need to go off on me. I qualified my first post with IIWM which is "if it were me" and IMO which is "in my opinion". You took that went to the Wby website, quoted the spec there and used it as a whinny, your wrong, your wrong, your wrong tantrum. What's up with that? My next post qualified why I think the Wby website is wrong. Then you went postal. All you needed to say was yes please go to Weatherby with a scale but that would have entered empirical data into the discussion. Dude, take a chill pill and stop living in the world of "gotta get Seaman". Well, that's what is seems like to me. I only gave my opinion and what I would do as a contribution to the discussion. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Heavy vs Light Long Range Rifle
Top