Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
H1000 variance in powder or chrono?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pdvdh" data-source="post: 1353281" data-attributes="member: 4191"><p>I agree with this, although the user learning curve with the light sensing Chrono's could be the culprit causing those common opinions.</p><p></p><p>I think you know I run 3 light sensing chronographs concurrently - one being the Oehler 35P. This has educated me on the reliability of light sensing chronographs. They have a few quirks, and they will throw out a bad velocity - occasionally. The bad data is easy to identify when running 3 concurrently, and has allowed me to learn some of the cause and effect.</p><p></p><p>By far and away, the user comments posting of inaccurate velocity data collected from light sensing chronographs - don't align with my personal experiences. I get very good quality data the vast majority of the time.</p><p></p><p>But they aren't error free. Which is the beauty of the 35P with its 2nd Proof channel. Unless you obtain at least two separate velocities for each bullet fired, there is no way the user can identify bad/flawed data.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pdvdh, post: 1353281, member: 4191"] I agree with this, although the user learning curve with the light sensing Chrono's could be the culprit causing those common opinions. I think you know I run 3 light sensing chronographs concurrently - one being the Oehler 35P. This has educated me on the reliability of light sensing chronographs. They have a few quirks, and they will throw out a bad velocity - occasionally. The bad data is easy to identify when running 3 concurrently, and has allowed me to learn some of the cause and effect. By far and away, the user comments posting of inaccurate velocity data collected from light sensing chronographs - don't align with my personal experiences. I get very good quality data the vast majority of the time. But they aren't error free. Which is the beauty of the 35P with its 2nd Proof channel. Unless you obtain at least two separate velocities for each bullet fired, there is no way the user can identify bad/flawed data. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
H1000 variance in powder or chrono?
Top