Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
GUN CONTROL
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Centre Punch" data-source="post: 108725" data-attributes="member: 3048"><p>JD,</p><p>In the scenarios that you described it was your duty to dissarm these people, what i am talking about is the moral issue, if your government decides to go against your constitutional rights to bear arms and decides on mass dissarmement of the people.</p><p></p><p>Here in Britain if you are a retired or reserve police officer or reserve military personal you have no right to carry a firearm unless it is for sporting purposes and then only at approved ranges or land for which the landowner has given permission and the authorities have cleared this land as a safe zone.</p><p></p><p>This does not include pistols and revolvers which are banned from all apart government agencies (police,security forces etc,)and knackermen.</p><p></p><p>Serving police officers are only allowed to carry guns after extensive training and then only as part of a tactical firearms unit whilst on duty.</p><p></p><p>It is however legal for all our Members of Parliament to carry concealed handguns when they conduct their ministerial duties.</p><p>An across the floor shoot out on a dissagreement, Now would'nt that be something "Gunfight at the Houses of Parliament" /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif</p><p></p><p>Ian.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Centre Punch, post: 108725, member: 3048"] JD, In the scenarios that you described it was your duty to dissarm these people, what i am talking about is the moral issue, if your government decides to go against your constitutional rights to bear arms and decides on mass dissarmement of the people. Here in Britain if you are a retired or reserve police officer or reserve military personal you have no right to carry a firearm unless it is for sporting purposes and then only at approved ranges or land for which the landowner has given permission and the authorities have cleared this land as a safe zone. This does not include pistols and revolvers which are banned from all apart government agencies (police,security forces etc,)and knackermen. Serving police officers are only allowed to carry guns after extensive training and then only as part of a tactical firearms unit whilst on duty. It is however legal for all our Members of Parliament to carry concealed handguns when they conduct their ministerial duties. An across the floor shoot out on a dissagreement, Now would'nt that be something "Gunfight at the Houses of Parliament" [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] Ian. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
GUN CONTROL
Top