Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
great load for the .300 RUM
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cousehunter" data-source="post: 77213" data-attributes="member: 3762"><p>The 200gr accubond launched at 3140 fps will catch the 180gr tsx (3275fps) at about the 200 yd range. However at 600 yds it will clock about 50fps faster and carry 350 more ft lbs of energy. The 180 tsx will carry 2330 ft lbs at that distance, so it's hard to see the serious disadvantage.</p><p>I see both bullets as very accurate for long distance shooting and would give the advantage to the tsx for high velocity, close shots. It will stay together under any conditions where the accubond has a tendancy to act like a ballistic tip with these types of shots.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cousehunter, post: 77213, member: 3762"] The 200gr accubond launched at 3140 fps will catch the 180gr tsx (3275fps) at about the 200 yd range. However at 600 yds it will clock about 50fps faster and carry 350 more ft lbs of energy. The 180 tsx will carry 2330 ft lbs at that distance, so it's hard to see the serious disadvantage. I see both bullets as very accurate for long distance shooting and would give the advantage to the tsx for high velocity, close shots. It will stay together under any conditions where the accubond has a tendancy to act like a ballistic tip with these types of shots. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
great load for the .300 RUM
Top