Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Good bullets?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AJ Peacock" data-source="post: 140506" data-attributes="member: 4885"><p>[ QUOTE ]</p><p>... I never realy gave the 200gr SMK a second look due to the low BC for the weight. I use the 190 SMK ...</p><p></p><p>[/ QUOTE ]</p><p></p><p>I BC's of .533 for the 190 SMK and .565 for the 200SMK.</p><p></p><p>A gain of .032BC for only 10gr additional weight is a pretty even trade in a 300 Win Mag.</p><p></p><p>At 750 yards, the 190SMK has a .25MOA advantage but the 200SMK has around a 80ftlb advantage in retained energy.</p><p></p><p>Sounds about like a wash to me? It really comes down to the individual needs and the individual rifle.</p><p></p><p>Don</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AJ Peacock, post: 140506, member: 4885"] [ QUOTE ] ... I never realy gave the 200gr SMK a second look due to the low BC for the weight. I use the 190 SMK ... [/ QUOTE ] I BC's of .533 for the 190 SMK and .565 for the 200SMK. A gain of .032BC for only 10gr additional weight is a pretty even trade in a 300 Win Mag. At 750 yards, the 190SMK has a .25MOA advantage but the 200SMK has around a 80ftlb advantage in retained energy. Sounds about like a wash to me? It really comes down to the individual needs and the individual rifle. Don [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Good bullets?
Top