Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Getting the right weight rifle
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sable tireur" data-source="post: 2547727" data-attributes="member: 27307"><p><strong>OP - What do you consider a "walking weight" rifle in 300WM? I got it that recoil tolerance is subjective. I can handle .30-06 type recoil just fine ( 8.5 pounds with scope). So whats your experience with heavier calibers, at finding the sweet spot of shootability vs carrying weight?</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>[ATTACH=full]370874[/ATTACH]</strong></p><p></p><p>I couldn't agree more, especially with a full length 26" barrel plus the suppressor. It is ungainly and can be problematic where forested land is concerned. However...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>These two statements from members with experience indicate that you might need to consider the project from the very beginning.</p><p></p><p>Too light, subjectively, can be difficult to control without the best rest affordable given your geography. Bipods are expeditious but add to your overall weight. Tripods take time to set up and you still have to carry them somehow.</p><p></p><p>The 10.5# is right in my wheelhouse. This seems to be where it is relatively easy to achieve given quality components. The obvious parts are easy to get the weights on but pay closer attention to scopes and rings. Here is where some serious ounces can be saved and should be a consideration long before the rifle parts are chosen. Be aware that some manufacturers do not pay close attention to the manufacturing of their 'lightweight' rings. If I have to machine the base of those rings to get the rings into alignment, they are not beneficial to me and make the cost of those rings substantially more.</p><p></p><p>Currently, I'm using some shorter 20" barrels in combination with suppressors in order to achieve a decent balance between weight and handling. Obviously with a 6" suppressor I have a 26" barrel but that beats a 32"+ (26+6") barrel any day for carrying.</p><p></p><p>Yes, a .300 Win. Mag. can be developed for efficiency in these shorter barrels. I usually achieve about 2950 fps using either the Berger 180 gr. Elite Hunter or the Nosler 180 gr. E-Tip. These can get you to 900 yards for over 1,000 ft/lbs.</p><p></p><p>Remember, weigh alone is not everything. If you find the perfect rifle but it's maybe a little heavier than you would like, start your pre-hunting workout a little sooner. I have to work harder/longer as I get older in order to keep up with the types of hunting I prefer.</p><p></p><p>Enjoy the process!</p><p></p><p><img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sable tireur, post: 2547727, member: 27307"] [B]OP - What do you consider a "walking weight" rifle in 300WM? I got it that recoil tolerance is subjective. I can handle .30-06 type recoil just fine ( 8.5 pounds with scope). So whats your experience with heavier calibers, at finding the sweet spot of shootability vs carrying weight? [ATTACH type="full" alt="1654694922495.png"]370874[/ATTACH][/B] I couldn't agree more, especially with a full length 26" barrel plus the suppressor. It is ungainly and can be problematic where forested land is concerned. However... These two statements from members with experience indicate that you might need to consider the project from the very beginning. Too light, subjectively, can be difficult to control without the best rest affordable given your geography. Bipods are expeditious but add to your overall weight. Tripods take time to set up and you still have to carry them somehow. The 10.5# is right in my wheelhouse. This seems to be where it is relatively easy to achieve given quality components. The obvious parts are easy to get the weights on but pay closer attention to scopes and rings. Here is where some serious ounces can be saved and should be a consideration long before the rifle parts are chosen. Be aware that some manufacturers do not pay close attention to the manufacturing of their 'lightweight' rings. If I have to machine the base of those rings to get the rings into alignment, they are not beneficial to me and make the cost of those rings substantially more. Currently, I'm using some shorter 20" barrels in combination with suppressors in order to achieve a decent balance between weight and handling. Obviously with a 6" suppressor I have a 26" barrel but that beats a 32"+ (26+6") barrel any day for carrying. Yes, a .300 Win. Mag. can be developed for efficiency in these shorter barrels. I usually achieve about 2950 fps using either the Berger 180 gr. Elite Hunter or the Nosler 180 gr. E-Tip. These can get you to 900 yards for over 1,000 ft/lbs. Remember, weigh alone is not everything. If you find the perfect rifle but it's maybe a little heavier than you would like, start your pre-hunting workout a little sooner. I have to work harder/longer as I get older in order to keep up with the types of hunting I prefer. Enjoy the process! :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Getting the right weight rifle
Top