Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Experiences with USO and NF
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MikeD31" data-source="post: 1206035" data-attributes="member: 95217"><p>Good morning from Kuwait LRH! </p><p></p><p>I'm looking for some insight and personal experience with a couple long range scopes; specifically the USO ER25 w/MPR and the NF ATACR F1 5-25 w/ MOAR.</p><p></p><p>Does anyone have any experience with either or both of these scopes? Eye box "forgiveness," eye relief consistency throughout the magnification range, reticle usability from top to bottom of magnification range etc. </p><p></p><p>I'm not overly concerned with weight as it's going to live on a precision "tactical" rifle that will be used 99% of the time as a range toy and bench queen. Also not too worried about the quality of glass as I feel that at this price point it's really a non-issue. I currently run a NF NXS 5.5-22 with MOAR reticle and am more than satisfied with that optic even tho it is largely regarded as having lesser glass than an S&B. </p><p>As far as MOA v MIL that's not an issue either. While it would be nice to have the same reticle as my current set up, the mil system will put me on the same page as my father who runs a mil reticle so it's a toss up between the two.</p><p></p><p>Any info is good info. </p><p></p><p>Thanks,</p><p>Mike</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MikeD31, post: 1206035, member: 95217"] Good morning from Kuwait LRH! I'm looking for some insight and personal experience with a couple long range scopes; specifically the USO ER25 w/MPR and the NF ATACR F1 5-25 w/ MOAR. Does anyone have any experience with either or both of these scopes? Eye box "forgiveness," eye relief consistency throughout the magnification range, reticle usability from top to bottom of magnification range etc. I'm not overly concerned with weight as it's going to live on a precision "tactical" rifle that will be used 99% of the time as a range toy and bench queen. Also not too worried about the quality of glass as I feel that at this price point it's really a non-issue. I currently run a NF NXS 5.5-22 with MOAR reticle and am more than satisfied with that optic even tho it is largely regarded as having lesser glass than an S&B. As far as MOA v MIL that's not an issue either. While it would be nice to have the same reticle as my current set up, the mil system will put me on the same page as my father who runs a mil reticle so it's a toss up between the two. Any info is good info. Thanks, Mike [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Experiences with USO and NF
Top