Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
ELD-M vs Berger
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sam Aspacher" data-source="post: 2039429" data-attributes="member: 53110"><p>I shot Berger 130 hvlds for years, elk, bear, mule and coues deer. Many quick kills, couple that seemed to "pencil" leading to followup shots.</p><p>Switched to the 147 eldm this year, albeit in a much faster cartridge, but really impressed with its terminal performance so far.</p><p>Far as bc value goes, I think they are off myself. Using the hornady app I ended up .75 moa low at 878 with all inputs accounted for. Even with axial form factor adjusted to the maximum value of 1.1 I still had to adjust the velocity to get the app to match my recorded drop.</p><p>Far as bullet consistently goes, I saw way more inconsistencies with the Bergers over the eldms. Bearing surface on the 130 Berger's was 0.490-0.502, 147 eldms was 0.668-0.669. 143 eldx was 0.647-0.652.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sam Aspacher, post: 2039429, member: 53110"] I shot Berger 130 hvlds for years, elk, bear, mule and coues deer. Many quick kills, couple that seemed to "pencil" leading to followup shots. Switched to the 147 eldm this year, albeit in a much faster cartridge, but really impressed with its terminal performance so far. Far as bc value goes, I think they are off myself. Using the hornady app I ended up .75 moa low at 878 with all inputs accounted for. Even with axial form factor adjusted to the maximum value of 1.1 I still had to adjust the velocity to get the app to match my recorded drop. Far as bullet consistently goes, I saw way more inconsistencies with the Bergers over the eldms. Bearing surface on the 130 Berger's was 0.490-0.502, 147 eldms was 0.668-0.669. 143 eldx was 0.647-0.652. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
ELD-M vs Berger
Top