Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Do larger calibers really compensate for bad shots?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Coyote_Hunter" data-source="post: 1748105" data-attributes="member: 110773"><p>You don't mention bullet construction but I'd bet the .22-250 used frangible varmint bullets and the .270 did not. Given frangible bullets, I'd go with the .270.</p><p></p><p>A lot of coyotes have dropped to my .22-250. Varmint bullets do the job quickly, fmj's and hunting bullets tend to do it slower.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Coyote_Hunter, post: 1748105, member: 110773"] You don't mention bullet construction but I'd bet the .22-250 used frangible varmint bullets and the .270 did not. Given frangible bullets, I'd go with the .270. A lot of coyotes have dropped to my .22-250. Varmint bullets do the job quickly, fmj's and hunting bullets tend to do it slower. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Do larger calibers really compensate for bad shots?
Top