Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
cooper 280 ai
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="yawn" data-source="post: 1025925" data-attributes="member: 13540"><p>I have no idea what you are saying here. I have not seen, mentioned or even thought of anything other then the two options. The simple fact is, in my rifle chambered by cooper in 280ai, nosler saami 280ai brass is a neat fit. If fires with no stretch at all and and I can comfortably and safely fire standard 280 rem ammo and brass.This is also the case with the other 5+ 280ai rifles I have been involved with. Im sorry this dosn't fit with your side of the discussion but its what I physically see and measure. It is not based no two different drawings made 22 years apart using different techniques. </p><p></p><p></p><p> Again, what is this third chamber you speak of? I do not see it, and with out giving it much thought Im not sure it would even be possible in this particular case. To repaeat my self my chamber is nothing in between, its a very nice fit for the saami spec. </p><p></p><p> If you think it irresponsible to claim there is no difference can I suggest you start a dialogue with the guys at gunsmith talk and tell them ( and us) where they went wrong in their demonstration. Keeping in mind these are the same guys that put out the warning in the first place. They went on to the physical test to prove it only to find the physical evidence actually proved the opposite , that there was no difference. Hard hard physical evidence. You can see it , touch it, measure it. </p><p></p><p> I also have no axe to grind here and I only continue the discussion out of mild curiosity and when I have a little spare time. Why? because there is to much conflicting information for me to be sure either way.</p><p> None of this changes the fact that that original chamber was designed to use standard 280rem brass and if the new saami chamber is in fact shorter, then there will be even less chance of case stretch so if the bolt will close on it then it should be fine to use the standard brass and ammo in either chamber as I and many others have been doing long before this fiasco hit the internet.</p><p> </p><p>Always enjoy the discussion thanks.</p><p> I think Ill just have to spend some money on some gauges and finally prove it to myself one way or another .</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="yawn, post: 1025925, member: 13540"] I have no idea what you are saying here. I have not seen, mentioned or even thought of anything other then the two options. The simple fact is, in my rifle chambered by cooper in 280ai, nosler saami 280ai brass is a neat fit. If fires with no stretch at all and and I can comfortably and safely fire standard 280 rem ammo and brass.This is also the case with the other 5+ 280ai rifles I have been involved with. Im sorry this dosn't fit with your side of the discussion but its what I physically see and measure. It is not based no two different drawings made 22 years apart using different techniques. Again, what is this third chamber you speak of? I do not see it, and with out giving it much thought Im not sure it would even be possible in this particular case. To repaeat my self my chamber is nothing in between, its a very nice fit for the saami spec. If you think it irresponsible to claim there is no difference can I suggest you start a dialogue with the guys at gunsmith talk and tell them ( and us) where they went wrong in their demonstration. Keeping in mind these are the same guys that put out the warning in the first place. They went on to the physical test to prove it only to find the physical evidence actually proved the opposite , that there was no difference. Hard hard physical evidence. You can see it , touch it, measure it. I also have no axe to grind here and I only continue the discussion out of mild curiosity and when I have a little spare time. Why? because there is to much conflicting information for me to be sure either way. None of this changes the fact that that original chamber was designed to use standard 280rem brass and if the new saami chamber is in fact shorter, then there will be even less chance of case stretch so if the bolt will close on it then it should be fine to use the standard brass and ammo in either chamber as I and many others have been doing long before this fiasco hit the internet. Always enjoy the discussion thanks. I think Ill just have to spend some money on some gauges and finally prove it to myself one way or another . [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
cooper 280 ai
Top