Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Bigger is better theory or truth?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wolf76" data-source="post: 1735471" data-attributes="member: 75779"><p>To many factors play a role in DRT shots-one of them is luck. I've hunted for 30 years and taken a good number of animals and I'll agree with what many have posted. Bullet construction, placement, energy/energy transfer, temporary/permanent wound cavity, calm vs high alert animal, etc. all play an important role. Short of headshots, nothing is a guaranteed DRT.</p><p>Back to the original question. Many times bigger is better. Example:. Shoot a deer in the lungs with a 22LR-contrast that with a 270 or 338 wm.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wolf76, post: 1735471, member: 75779"] To many factors play a role in DRT shots-one of them is luck. I've hunted for 30 years and taken a good number of animals and I'll agree with what many have posted. Bullet construction, placement, energy/energy transfer, temporary/permanent wound cavity, calm vs high alert animal, etc. all play an important role. Short of headshots, nothing is a guaranteed DRT. Back to the original question. Many times bigger is better. Example:. Shoot a deer in the lungs with a 22LR-contrast that with a 270 or 338 wm. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Bigger is better theory or truth?
Top