Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Administration
Website & Forum Support
Article On "How To Deal With Long Range Skeptics"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NZ Longranger" data-source="post: 177854" data-attributes="member: 14"><p>Guys,</p><p>Just a few quick thoughts from my perspective in NZ. The issue is the same where ever in the world you are. When I first starting writing about longrange hunting 10 or so years ago, the furore was the same as you've all experienced, all emotive arguments based on ignorance. I can't remember the number of times I've been accused of just sitting on a hill and shooting deer and not even walking over to collect them. Always by people who don't know me and have never been hunting with me.</p><p>The usual comments thrown around:</p><p> </p><p>That's not hunting.</p><p>Anyone can do that.</p><p>Too lazy to stalk closer, doesn't recover his deer.</p><p>Should be shooting at cardboard cutouts, not real deer.</p><p>More chance of wounding, therefore unethical.</p><p>Its boring, too easy.</p><p> </p><p>Most of these are laughable as you can see, and just another example of the tall poppie syndrome (if you've heard of that) and a chance for the whingers to have a go. They are the same people who whinge about most other topics as well.</p><p>The tricky one is the ethical question, and I agree with Shawn, its the hunter not the method who is ethical/unethical as I've seen many times.</p><p>The Longrange hunter is no different to the bowhunter, brush blaster, buckshot user or any other method of taking game. All can wound and therefore take longer to kill the animal than is ideal if done badly, and there are far more poor examples of the latter methods here in NZ. I'm sure this applies in the US as well.</p><p>The Hunting Forums here in NZ have been interesting to study over the last 10 years. Initially the debate would have been 90% against long range hunting, but now its closer to 75% the other way, with the odd whinger getting a blasting from the long range hunters who frequent these sites. I know from all the hunters I guide how things have changed, with a lot saying when they arrive they dont want to hunt longrange, but by the end of the hunt they want to beat their mate's shot by 100 yards, and then another 100 and so one, especially when they miss at close range with their own rifles. They come back hunting with me again just to further their longest shot, sort of a different form of trophy hunting, scoring yards not points.</p><p>These are always the guys who were most vehemently against it at the start. Always gives me a quiet chuckle! </p><p>long range hunting is the fastest growing hunting recreation here in NZ, as people upgrade their gear and gradually realise what its capable of. They extend their capabilities as they feel comfortable and develop a whole lot more satisfaction from their hunting. If getting more game is your objective, long range hunting will achieve that. For some hunters, that is their motivation. The retailers also have changed significantly as they realise the long range hunting hunter buys far more gear and spends far more money! Unfortunately the skill and intelligence level of the average retailer in this country is somewhat lacking, but the hunters are learning what they want from the likes of my articles in the magazines and the forums like long range hunting, and are requesting the right equipment despite some of the small minded salesmen.</p><p>What I'm trying to say is there is a quiet revolution going on behind the scenes and the dribblers are getting left behind. You'll never change them, just move around them and carry on. Answer worthy questions when they come up and don't get into arguments with the unreasonable. Let actions speak louder than rhetoric, be true to your own ethics and the truth will always eventually get out!</p><p>Maybe I'm a born optimist, glass half full type of guy, but that's what I believe.</p><p> </p><p>Keith, my family enjoyed your article and like your perspective. We agree with most of your comments but leave the shooting through brush bit out, I've done that before to finish animals and there are too many variables such as thickneess, how close the brush is to animal etc to be definitive. If this sort of article is posted, I think it should be a closed reference only type of thread to satisfy the need to present good infromation without starting destructive arguments.</p><p> </p><p>Man, so much for a quick reply!!!!!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NZ Longranger, post: 177854, member: 14"] Guys, Just a few quick thoughts from my perspective in NZ. The issue is the same where ever in the world you are. When I first starting writing about longrange hunting 10 or so years ago, the furore was the same as you've all experienced, all emotive arguments based on ignorance. I can't remember the number of times I've been accused of just sitting on a hill and shooting deer and not even walking over to collect them. Always by people who don't know me and have never been hunting with me. The usual comments thrown around: That's not hunting. Anyone can do that. Too lazy to stalk closer, doesn't recover his deer. Should be shooting at cardboard cutouts, not real deer. More chance of wounding, therefore unethical. Its boring, too easy. Most of these are laughable as you can see, and just another example of the tall poppie syndrome (if you've heard of that) and a chance for the whingers to have a go. They are the same people who whinge about most other topics as well. The tricky one is the ethical question, and I agree with Shawn, its the hunter not the method who is ethical/unethical as I've seen many times. The Longrange hunter is no different to the bowhunter, brush blaster, buckshot user or any other method of taking game. All can wound and therefore take longer to kill the animal than is ideal if done badly, and there are far more poor examples of the latter methods here in NZ. I'm sure this applies in the US as well. The Hunting Forums here in NZ have been interesting to study over the last 10 years. Initially the debate would have been 90% against long range hunting, but now its closer to 75% the other way, with the odd whinger getting a blasting from the long range hunters who frequent these sites. I know from all the hunters I guide how things have changed, with a lot saying when they arrive they dont want to hunt longrange, but by the end of the hunt they want to beat their mate's shot by 100 yards, and then another 100 and so one, especially when they miss at close range with their own rifles. They come back hunting with me again just to further their longest shot, sort of a different form of trophy hunting, scoring yards not points. These are always the guys who were most vehemently against it at the start. Always gives me a quiet chuckle! long range hunting is the fastest growing hunting recreation here in NZ, as people upgrade their gear and gradually realise what its capable of. They extend their capabilities as they feel comfortable and develop a whole lot more satisfaction from their hunting. If getting more game is your objective, long range hunting will achieve that. For some hunters, that is their motivation. The retailers also have changed significantly as they realise the long range hunting hunter buys far more gear and spends far more money! Unfortunately the skill and intelligence level of the average retailer in this country is somewhat lacking, but the hunters are learning what they want from the likes of my articles in the magazines and the forums like long range hunting, and are requesting the right equipment despite some of the small minded salesmen. What I'm trying to say is there is a quiet revolution going on behind the scenes and the dribblers are getting left behind. You'll never change them, just move around them and carry on. Answer worthy questions when they come up and don't get into arguments with the unreasonable. Let actions speak louder than rhetoric, be true to your own ethics and the truth will always eventually get out! Maybe I'm a born optimist, glass half full type of guy, but that's what I believe. Keith, my family enjoyed your article and like your perspective. We agree with most of your comments but leave the shooting through brush bit out, I've done that before to finish animals and there are too many variables such as thickneess, how close the brush is to animal etc to be definitive. If this sort of article is posted, I think it should be a closed reference only type of thread to satisfy the need to present good infromation without starting destructive arguments. Man, so much for a quick reply!!!!! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Administration
Website & Forum Support
Article On "How To Deal With Long Range Skeptics"
Top