Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Are the best presses for minimal run-out necessary?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="3800fps" data-source="post: 1808142" data-attributes="member: 42309"><p>Assuming the case neck thickness is uniform (it never is...that's why we sort em with our case neck mic tool),</p><p>and our chambers are concentric and round...</p><p>run-out is created in the reloading process...the more run-out the more something is being forced, pushed/dragged out of line...</p><p> the concepts incorporated in the CoAx press and forester dies mean that guys knew there were problems with run-out. Some one set out to correct it...it was Forrester....floating shell holder, floating die holder, neck supported neck expansion and supported bullet seating....all this to eliminate the possibility of forcing things out of line...</p><p> The other presses and dies can be tweaked and tuned....</p><p>I personally hate rebuilding something to get it to perform the way it should have performed right out of the box....</p><p>The next step up from a Co-ax press is benchresters presses and hand dies from Wilson, Fred Sinclair etc.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="3800fps, post: 1808142, member: 42309"] Assuming the case neck thickness is uniform (it never is...that's why we sort em with our case neck mic tool), and our chambers are concentric and round... run-out is created in the reloading process...the more run-out the more something is being forced, pushed/dragged out of line... the concepts incorporated in the CoAx press and forester dies mean that guys knew there were problems with run-out. Some one set out to correct it...it was Forrester....floating shell holder, floating die holder, neck supported neck expansion and supported bullet seating....all this to eliminate the possibility of forcing things out of line... The other presses and dies can be tweaked and tuned.... I personally hate rebuilding something to get it to perform the way it should have performed right out of the box.... The next step up from a Co-ax press is benchresters presses and hand dies from Wilson, Fred Sinclair etc. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Are the best presses for minimal run-out necessary?
Top