Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Accubond failures?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="1doug" data-source="post: 119637" data-attributes="member: 3863"><p>Most people think that they fail when they recover a bullet and it had shed 35% of its weight. Nosler designed them to perform like a partition but with better balistics like a BT. They were never designed for 90+ % weight retention. I only know of a couple that claim that Swift sirrocco 2 and the barnes line. </p><p></p><p>d-a</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="1doug, post: 119637, member: 3863"] Most people think that they fail when they recover a bullet and it had shed 35% of its weight. Nosler designed them to perform like a partition but with better balistics like a BT. They were never designed for 90+ % weight retention. I only know of a couple that claim that Swift sirrocco 2 and the barnes line. d-a [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Accubond failures?
Top