Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
7mm Sherman Short Mag vs 300 Win mag
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="elkaholic" data-source="post: 1198231" data-attributes="member: 13833"><p>Actually, the 195 has a higher sectional density than the 215. There is one other variable that will make a difference (good or bad)? The 215's are a target bullet while the 195's are hunting (Bergers designaton). This SHOULD give the 215 an edge at closer range and the 195's at longer range with the thinner jacket. This is all else equal and does not take into account frontal area and cavity depth.................Rich</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="elkaholic, post: 1198231, member: 13833"] Actually, the 195 has a higher sectional density than the 215. There is one other variable that will make a difference (good or bad)? The 215's are a target bullet while the 195's are hunting (Bergers designaton). This SHOULD give the 215 an edge at closer range and the 195's at longer range with the thinner jacket. This is all else equal and does not take into account frontal area and cavity depth.................Rich [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
7mm Sherman Short Mag vs 300 Win mag
Top