Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
7mm Sherman Short Mag vs 300 Win mag
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Broz" data-source="post: 1197515" data-attributes="member: 7503"><p>Thank you and Yes Sir, Like I said Rich has an awesome well though out line up, very efficent. Please know my post was not aimed at you are anyone alone. I just happen to have spent what I feel is a lot of time and money trying to get the 7's to out preform the 30's. I was all set to rebarrel by 300 win to 7-300 for the 195's. After the due process of real research I decided the 300 is a much better option for my needs.</p><p> </p><p>In these type discussions, particularly the 7's and the 30's, it is often taken over by emotions and pride of ownership. Or just "what I like" kicks in. Then we get jaded posts with undocumented results and snide comments. I felt I had something to offer to this thread with the research I have done and wanted to share it.</p><p> </p><p>There are many options out there as far as chamberings, action lengths, efficiency, case capacity and so on for each. What I hoped to convey was an equal comparison for the 7 and the 30. What ever you do to one to make it more efficient, you can also do to the other. But it does take dedication and money. Again I commend Rich for his work and design. I would hope he would agree with my posts.</p><p> </p><p>Respectfully,</p><p>Jeff</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Broz, post: 1197515, member: 7503"] Thank you and Yes Sir, Like I said Rich has an awesome well though out line up, very efficent. Please know my post was not aimed at you are anyone alone. I just happen to have spent what I feel is a lot of time and money trying to get the 7's to out preform the 30's. I was all set to rebarrel by 300 win to 7-300 for the 195's. After the due process of real research I decided the 300 is a much better option for my needs. In these type discussions, particularly the 7's and the 30's, it is often taken over by emotions and pride of ownership. Or just "what I like" kicks in. Then we get jaded posts with undocumented results and snide comments. I felt I had something to offer to this thread with the research I have done and wanted to share it. There are many options out there as far as chamberings, action lengths, efficiency, case capacity and so on for each. What I hoped to convey was an equal comparison for the 7 and the 30. What ever you do to one to make it more efficient, you can also do to the other. But it does take dedication and money. Again I commend Rich for his work and design. I would hope he would agree with my posts. Respectfully, Jeff [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
7mm Sherman Short Mag vs 300 Win mag
Top