Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
7mag 160 gr partition at near max speed vs 300wsm 165gr partition or accubond at near max speed.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MagnumManiac" data-source="post: 1586238" data-attributes="member: 10755"><p>I find the Partition to work very well, however, the Accubond IMHO is the ducks guts as far as penetration goes.</p><p>I have witnessed the Accubond, both 180/200gr 30 cal and 225/250gr 338 cal, go end to end on frontal shots on quite a few different sized critters, including Girrafe and Eland of the very large variety.</p><p></p><p>In all honesty, either will get the job done, but I would lean towards the Accubond personally.</p><p></p><p>Cheers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MagnumManiac, post: 1586238, member: 10755"] I find the Partition to work very well, however, the Accubond IMHO is the ducks guts as far as penetration goes. I have witnessed the Accubond, both 180/200gr 30 cal and 225/250gr 338 cal, go end to end on frontal shots on quite a few different sized critters, including Girrafe and Eland of the very large variety. In all honesty, either will get the job done, but I would lean towards the Accubond personally. Cheers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
7mag 160 gr partition at near max speed vs 300wsm 165gr partition or accubond at near max speed.
Top