Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
60* or 90*, preference? One better than the other?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Darryle" data-source="post: 2588305" data-attributes="member: 109917"><p>What height rings on those? Anything pictured in lows? </p><p></p><p>I agree that stock design and selection pay a huge part in this equation. That pictured rifle of mine proves that stock, action, rings and scope have to be synced or there will be issues.</p><p></p><p>I don't like high rings, I prefer compact and as low as possible to give me a good cheek weld.</p><p></p><p>FTR: I had a Swarovski, Leupold and Vortex on that rifle prior to the Leica and they all exhibited the same issue.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Darryle, post: 2588305, member: 109917"] What height rings on those? Anything pictured in lows? I agree that stock design and selection pay a huge part in this equation. That pictured rifle of mine proves that stock, action, rings and scope have to be synced or there will be issues. I don't like high rings, I prefer compact and as low as possible to give me a good cheek weld. FTR: I had a Swarovski, Leupold and Vortex on that rifle prior to the Leica and they all exhibited the same issue. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
60* or 90*, preference? One better than the other?
Top