Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
6.5 - 2900 ft/s most efficiently?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="VLD Pilot" data-source="post: 1505036" data-attributes="member: 103947"><p>I certainly don't see why the 270 will not equal the 264 or 284 calibers for deer hunting. For the long range target shooting however, the 6.5 and 7 mm will be superior rounds. I personally hunt with a 270 quite often in an autoloader and have harvested several whitetail deer with it . It is tough to beat the 270 as a deer cartridge</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="VLD Pilot, post: 1505036, member: 103947"] I certainly don't see why the 270 will not equal the 264 or 284 calibers for deer hunting. For the long range target shooting however, the 6.5 and 7 mm will be superior rounds. I personally hunt with a 270 quite often in an autoloader and have harvested several whitetail deer with it . It is tough to beat the 270 as a deer cartridge [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
6.5 - 2900 ft/s most efficiently?
Top