Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
338 SHERMAN MAX
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="elkaholic" data-source="post: 1621384" data-attributes="member: 13833"><p>It just occurred to me that it's worth mentioning that even though the Max case was designed to run in a 3.1" magazine if you were going to use something like a 250 Berger, most of the spitzer style 338 bullets, that many would likely use, would still run under 3" coal in a std short action. Food for thought if you want to have a short action Hammer for bears, etc with something like a 250 Accubond!</p><p>Also Steve (Hammer Bullets) might have, or could design, a lighter mono in the Sledgehammer design that would work?</p><p>What about that Steve?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="elkaholic, post: 1621384, member: 13833"] It just occurred to me that it's worth mentioning that even though the Max case was designed to run in a 3.1" magazine if you were going to use something like a 250 Berger, most of the spitzer style 338 bullets, that many would likely use, would still run under 3" coal in a std short action. Food for thought if you want to have a short action Hammer for bears, etc with something like a 250 Accubond! Also Steve (Hammer Bullets) might have, or could design, a lighter mono in the Sledgehammer design that would work? What about that Steve? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
338 SHERMAN MAX
Top