Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
308 loads
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wachsmann" data-source="post: 1668835" data-attributes="member: 10429"><p>I'm shooting a cheap marlin with a 26 inch 1/12 twist and the 178 actually out preform the 168 at the long range due to the higher BC. Its not by much but I'm a few clicks more on the 168 than the 178s at 1000yrds. I think the 178 are only 20fps slower or maybe less. Different powder though. It could also be the charge weight I think. The 168 are about 1.5 grains from max charge and I think the 178 actually gave me better results closer to max book charge. Anyway that's my take.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wachsmann, post: 1668835, member: 10429"] I'm shooting a cheap marlin with a 26 inch 1/12 twist and the 178 actually out preform the 168 at the long range due to the higher BC. Its not by much but I'm a few clicks more on the 168 than the 178s at 1000yrds. I think the 178 are only 20fps slower or maybe less. Different powder though. It could also be the charge weight I think. The 168 are about 1.5 grains from max charge and I think the 178 actually gave me better results closer to max book charge. Anyway that's my take. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
308 loads
Top