Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
300 WM: rifle weight vs. felt recoil
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MagnumManiac" data-source="post: 2143169" data-attributes="member: 10755"><p>My Kimber 8400's 300WM and Super America's 300WM handle the recoil better than my Winchester Super Grade in 338WM. I also have the above Kimbers in 338WM as well, recoil feels like a 30-06 with a 220gr.</p><p>The WORST rifle I ever owned, besides my 505 Gibbs, for recoil that bruised me was a boat paddle stocked Ruger in 300, nasty ***. It even made the scope slide in the rings.</p><p></p><p>Cheers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MagnumManiac, post: 2143169, member: 10755"] My Kimber 8400’s 300WM and Super America’s 300WM handle the recoil better than my Winchester Super Grade in 338WM. I also have the above Kimbers in 338WM as well, recoil feels like a 30-06 with a 220gr. The WORST rifle I ever owned, besides my 505 Gibbs, for recoil that bruised me was a boat paddle stocked Ruger in 300, nasty ***. It even made the scope slide in the rings. Cheers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
300 WM: rifle weight vs. felt recoil
Top