Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
300 WM: rifle weight vs. felt recoil
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Highvoltage" data-source="post: 2141717" data-attributes="member: 109082"><p>If your looking at getting a complete new rifle and are worried about recoil why not reconsider a different caliber. Something like a 280ai or the 270 wsm. I think many would agree that you won't be undergunned in the lower 48. Now to stay on topic... I have a 700 with a Ross shuler 4 port break on a 300 win mag and you can shoot it all day long off the bench with 180 class bullets. Of the rifles you listed I like the ridgeline. Just something to consider</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Highvoltage, post: 2141717, member: 109082"] If your looking at getting a complete new rifle and are worried about recoil why not reconsider a different caliber. Something like a 280ai or the 270 wsm. I think many would agree that you won’t be undergunned in the lower 48. Now to stay on topic... I have a 700 with a Ross shuler 4 port break on a 300 win mag and you can shoot it all day long off the bench with 180 class bullets. Of the rifles you listed I like the ridgeline. Just something to consider [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
300 WM: rifle weight vs. felt recoil
Top